Welding material is one of the most important industrial auxiliary sectors, which is indispensable to fields such as: shipbuilding, cars and motorbikes production, and other electronic industries. In the first 7 months 2019, the Ministry of Industry and Trade carried out examination dossiers of 3 cases, one of them is a dossier requesting to investigate to apply anti-dumping measures on welding material.

On Jun 28th, 2019, Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam (Investigating Body) received the Dossier requesting for investigating to apply anti-dumping measures on welding material products originating from People’s Republic of China, Kingdom of Thailand and Malaysia. This dossier is applied by companies representing the domestic industry (Requesting Party).

Requesting Party includes 01 company: Kim Tin Group Joint Stock Company. Kim Tin Group Joint Stock Company is a large enterprise in manufacturing and trading of welding materials: welding rods, welding wire, welding flux, color metal, steel nails, ligature, machines, devices, board of MDF, mineral exploitation and logistics service in Vietnam.

On Oct 28th, 2019, the Requesting Party fully submitted additional information at request.

On Nov 07th, 2019, the Investigating Body confirmed that Dossier was complete, valid according to regulations of law on trade remedies.

On Jan 25th, 2020, Trade Remedies Authority received official dispatch from the Requesting Party on withdrawing dossier requesting for investigating to apply anti-dumping measures on welding material products.

Due to the Requesting Party’ s request for withdrawing dossier, Trade Remedies Authority informed that no investigation to apply anti-dumping measures on welding material products originating from People’s Republic of China, Kingdom of Thailand and Malaysia is initiated.

Our international trade and tax lawyers, and antitrust lawyers at ANT Lawyers, a law firms in Vietnam have always followed the development of the situation and updated the clients on relevant matters.

On May 13, 2020, The United States Department of Commerce (“DOC'') received an investigation request for anti-dumping and countervailing measures against passenger and light truck tires (“PVLT tires”) originating from Korea, Taiwan-China, Thailand and Vietnam. The mandatory respondents being US importers have also consulted with anti-dumping and countervailing duty lawyers in Vietnam and US to prepare for the investigation cooperation.

In this case, the plaintiff alleges that the tires under investigation were dumped and subsidized into the United States market, causing significant damage to the domestic manufacturing industry. In 2015, the same petitioner succeeded in securing anti-dumping and countervailing duties on PVLT tires from China.

The scope of these investigations is passenger vehicle and light truck tires. Passenger vehicle and light truck tires are new pneumatic tires, of rubber, with a passenger vehicle or light truck size designation. Tires covered by these orders may be tube-type, tubeless, radial, or nonradial, and they may be intended for sale to original equipment manufacturers or the replacement market. The products covered by the investigations are currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheadings: 4011.10.10.10, 4011.10.10.20, 4011.10.10.30, 4011.10.10.40, 4011.10.10.50, 4011.10.10.60, 4011.10.10.70, 4011.10.50.00, 4011.20.10.05, and 4011.20.50.10. The scope could also include tires entering under HTSUS subheadings 4011.90.10.10, 4011.90.10.50, 4011.90.20.10, 4011.90.20.50, 4011.90.80.10, 4011.90.80.50, 8708.70.45.30, 8708.70.45.46, 8708.70.45.48, 8708.70.45.80, 8708.70.60.30, 8708.70.60.45, and 8708.70.60.60.

Petitioner alleges the following dumping margins: 45.95% to 195.20% for South Korea, 21% to 102% for Taiwan, 106.4% to 217.5% for Thailand, and 14.73% to 33.06% for Vietnam. The petitions also detail numerous government subsidies benefiting Vietnamese tire producers, including loans, tax breaks, and grants. PVLT tire imports from these four countries shot up nearly 20% from 2017 to 2019, reaching 85.3 million tires, valued at 4.4 billion dollars, last year.

According to data from the United States International Trade Commission (“USITC”), the export value of Vietnam’s investigated products to the United States market reached 12.1 million dollars in 2019, accounting for about 6.7% of total United States imports of this product.

In Vietnam, the product under investigation is a product that has been warned by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of risks of foreign investigation by applying trade remedies measures from July 2019 with a high level of warning. Therefore, in the past time, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has actively coordinated and worked with associations and exporters to the United States to actively capture information and respond in case of initiating an investigation. Under United States regulations, the DOC will consider initiating an investigation of the case within 20 days of receiving it. In the event that the DOC decides to initiate an investigation, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam will closely coordinate with export associations and enterprises in investigating the case and have timely support and treatment measures to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Vietnamese enterprises.

Vietnam international trade lawyers in competition, and anti-dumping practice will need to be involved with the process including data collection and possibly initial drafting of questionnaire responses in cooperation with US anti-dumping and countervailing duty lawyers to defend the case.

On September 21st 2020, the Minister of Ministry of Industry and Trade signed the Decision No. 2466/QD-BCT regarding the Investigation of imposing Anti-dumping and Countervailing measures to some sugar cane products from Thailand. Related parties may by themselves or authorize experienced law firms in Vietnam on international trade to work with Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam (TRAV) to cooperate and respond.

1.Background

On August 08, 2020, Trade Remedies of authority of Vietnam (TRAV), Ministry of Industry and Trade received the dossiers on requesting the anti-dumping measure to some sugar cane from Thailand. The requester is 6 Companies representing for domestic industry being (i) Son La Sugar Joint Stock Company; (ii) Son Duong Sugar and Sugarcane Joint Stock Company; (iii) KCP VietNam Industries Limited; (iv) Can Tho sugar Joint stock Company; (v) The 333 Sugar Joint Stock Company; (vi) Soc Trang Sugar Corporation.

The requester provided the reasonable bases for calculation of dumping margin and acts of countervailing originated from Thailand. The requester provided the reasonable information to prove the significant damage of domestic industry. The requester’s dossier proved the existence of causal relationship between imported products and the significant damage of domestic industry.

Hence, TRAV determined the dossier of the requester satisfied the law of anti-dumping, countervailing and petition of the Minister of Ministry of Industry and Trade.

2.Investigation’s details

i) Products under investigation

Product’s name: Sugar cane

Scientific name: Sacarose sugar (sucrose)

Common name: include but not limited to sanding sugar, sugar cane, crystal sugar, raw sugar, white sugar, refined sugar.

Sugar cane products are classified under the following HS code: 1701.1300, 1701.1400, 1701.9910.

The Ministry of Industry and Trade may amend and supplement the list of HS codes of the product under investigation to be in accordance with the description of the product under investigation and other changes (if any).

ii) Originated of products under investigation: Thailand

iii) Period of investigation (POI)

-Period of investigation to determine the anti-dumping and countervailing action: from July 1st 2019 to June 30th 2020

-Period of investigation to determine the damage of domestic industry:

The first year: from July 1st 2017 to June 30th 2018

The second year: from July 1st 2017 to June 30th 2019

The third year: from July 1st 2017 to June 30th 2020

iv) Duty Levels Proposed by Requester:

The anti-dumping duty which is requested by the requester is 37,9%.

3.Register as related parties

Pursuant to Article 6 of Circular No. 37/2019/TT-BCT, organizations and individuals stipulated in Article 74 of Law on foreign trade management may register as related parties in this case with TRAV in order to access to publicly circulated information during the investigation process, send comments, information and evidence related to the investigation content within sixty (60) working days from the day on which the decision on investigation takes effect via post or email.

In order to ensure rights and interests, the investigating authority recommends that organizations and individuals which produce, import or use products under investigation register as related parties to carry out the right to access information, provide information and express opinions during the investigation process.

4.Investigation Questionnaire

Within 15 days after the issuance of the investigation decision of the Minister of Industry and Trade, the Investigating Authority shall send the investigation questionnaire to the Related Parties, including:

-The applicant requests for application of Anti-dumping and Countervailing measures;

-Other domestic manufacturers which Investigating Authority knows;

-Parties requesting for application investigation of anti-dumping and countervailing measures which Investigating Authority knows;

-Importers of products under investigation;

-Diplomatic authorities of the country where the origin of products under investigation;

-Other related

5.Cooperating in the investigation process

Any related party refuses to participate in the case or does not provide necessary evidence or significantly ​obstructs the completion of the investigation, the investigation conclusion regarding such relevant party shall be based on available information.

Any related party provides false or misleading evidence, such evidence shall not be reviewed and investigation conclusions regarding such relevant party shall be based on available information.

TRAV recommends that related parties participate and cooperate fully in the process in order to ensure legitimate rights and interests and avoid potential disputes.

On August 18th, 2020, Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam (TRAV) acknowledged the Dossier on request of investigation to impose the anti-dumping measures to Sorbitol chemical products originated from China, India and Indonesia from the companies representing the domestic industry (Requester). If there are anti-dumping actions, the anti-dumping investigation will be initiated and related parties would cooperate with TRAV to provide data as required.

On the basis of assessing the Dossier, on September 30th, 2020, TRAV had confirmed the sufficiency of the dossiers according to the laws on trade remedy.

Within 45 days from the date of receiving sufficient and lawful dossier, TRAV will assess the dossier to submit to the Minister of Ministry of Industry and Trade for consideration whether to process the investigation.

The assessment’s contents includes:

-Identify the legal representative status of the domestic industry of organizations and individuals who submit dossier in accordance with the Law on Foreign Trade Management;

-Define evidence on the dumping of imported goods that cause or threaten to cause significant losses to a domestic manufacturing industry or substantially prevent the formation of a domestic manufacturing industry.

In order to serve the assessment process, as well as to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of the enterprise, TRAV recommends that the domestic enterprises manufacturing trading in the same goods mentioned above provide the following information.

-Enterprise’s information;

-Capacity/design and production of Sorbitol chemical products in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020;

-Enterprise’s opinion on the case (to agree, oppose, have no opinion);

-Any document/evidence which companies consider to be related to the case

-The due date to provide the above information is before 5p.m October 16th, 2020.

Our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of international trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firms in Vietnam, always follow up trade remedy development to update clients on regular basis.

Shareholders are individual or organization that owns at least one share of the joint-stock company and also are owner of the joint-stock company. Along with these roles, their interests are tied to business operations although they may not directly manage the day-to-day company affairs. In order to implement governance, the powers and responsibilities of each interest group such as shareholders, the board of directors, managerial personnel, etc. should be assigned based on the statutory principles and procedures.

According to the regulations on shareholders in the Law on Enterprise 2020, the rights of shareholders can be categorized into the following groups: economic rights, governance rights, information rights, and litigation rights.

Economic rights

Economic right is the right to gain all pecuniary interest with respect to the shares. The purpose of starting a business or investing in securities comes mainly from earning income or gaining profits. Economic rights accordingly include:

-Right to entitlement to dividends

-Right to transfer ownership

-Priority right to acquire the newly issued shares

-Right to entitlement to a portion of the assets after dissolution or bankrupt

-Appraisal Right

Among these above rights, right to entitlement to dividends and right to transfer ownership are the fundamental economic rights of a shareholder.

Dividend of common shares is determined according to the realized net profit and the dividend payment from the company’s retained earnings. Despite right to entitlement to dividends, shareholders are still subject to a number of limitations in law and in fact. Dividend entitlement is determined by the General Meeting of Shareholders based on the recommendation of the Board of Directors, after the company has fulfilled tax obligations and other financial obligations, contributed to reserve fund, paid for previous losses and met the solvency for all due debts and other property obligations. Dividend is not required to be distributed annually. Depending on the business situation, the General Meeting of Shareholders may decide to retain profits for reinvestment.

Besides dividend entitlement from the company’s operating results, shareholders can also gain profits by share transfer. This kind of investment is popular with respect of shares or securities of public companies, investors do not aim for corporate governance rights as well as dividend, they intend to earn benefits by the difference of the market values of stocks, especially when the stock value increases.

Governance rights

Modern corporate governance has two principles, one is to separate ownership and governance and to separate governance and management. It means that the major shareholders should not hold senior managerial positions in the company and Chairperson of the Board of Directors should not be assigned to other senior managerial positions such as General Director and/or Director.

Shareholders may be an individual or organization which they have their own different interests, goals and abilities. The separation between ownership and management makes the situation of whom the owner is and how the share get transferred not to affect the business operation. In the meantime, the separation helps gather professional managers to implement target intended by the company. According to the laws, members of the Board of Directors of a public company concurrently holding several executive titles must be reduced to the minimum to ensure the independence of the Board of Directors, specially the Chairperson of the Board of Directors shall not be the Director/General Director in a public company as of August 1st, 2020. There are no similar rules applicable to joint stock companies which are not public company.

Attendance, speaking and voting at General Meeting of Shareholders are fundamental in governance right of common shareholders, applicable to all shareholders holding at least one share. ty. In principle, being a shareholder who holds shares of the company regardless of the number has equal rights to attend and vote at the General Meeting of Shareholders. By the General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders holding a certain number of shares can impact decisions on some matters such as election, dismissal, and removal of members of the Board of Directors and Controllers, amendment and supplementation of internal documents, major transactions, and others as stipulated in law on enterprise or charter. In addition to the above rights, the majority shareholders also have a number of other rights related to governance as follows:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Call a General Meeting of Shareholders

-Request Board of Controllers to inspect each specific matter relating to management, governance of company affairs if necessary

-Recommend matters to be included in agenda of General Meeting of Shareholders

-The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 10% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to nominate candidates for the Board of Directors, Board of Controllers

Information rights

Shareholders have the right to access documents and information of the company. In addition to the basic documents such as the charter, list of shareholders, meeting minutes and resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders have the right to access to reports related to the business affairs.

However, some information is only reviewed by shareholders who own required percentage of share:

-Access and extract information on full name and contact address as specified in list of shareholders having voting right and list of shareholders having right to attend General Meeting of Shareholder; request to adjust his/her inaccurate information

-Access, extract and scan charter of company, meeting minutes of General Meeting of Shareholder and its resolution

-Access, extract and copy partial or whole list of involved persons and their contracts, transaction of which the company is other party, interests of Board of Directors, Controllers, Directors or General Directors and other managerial positions of company

-Access and extract minutes and resolutions of Board of Directors, annual or mid-year financial reports, reports of Board of Controllers, contracts and transaction approved by Board of Directors and other documents, excepting for documents related to company’s know-how and trade secrets (applicable to shareholder and group of shareholders who own at least 5% of total number of common shares, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

-Access profit and loss statements, finacial reports, governace and management assement reports; inspection reports of Board of Controllers (applicable to shareholder who own shares at least 1 consecutive year, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

Different to common joint stock company, a public company must annouce fully, accurately and promptly the periodic and extraordinary information on business, finance and governace. Other information must be annouced if it influences share price and investment decisions of shareholders and investors.

Litigation rights

The Law on Enterprises has provided a mechanism to request the Court or Arbitration to rescind the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders or sue the managerial personnels when they fail to fully and properly implement their tasks, including:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and making resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders seriously violate the regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter

-However, the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders adopted by 100% of the total number of voting shares is legal and effective even when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and adopting such resolution violates regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter.

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when its provisions violates the laws or company’s charter

-The shareholder, group of shareholders holding at least 1% of the total number of common shares is entitled to:

-Sue members of Board of Directors, Directors, General Directors separately or jointly under certain circumstances

The Chairperson of Board of Directors or the Director or General Director usually acts as the legal representative of the company, representing the company to perform rights and obligations arising from the company’s transactions, representing the company to take proceedings before the court or arbitrator. However, when their interests conflict with those of the shareholders, shareholders have the right to initiate a lawsuit claiming benefits or compensation. The Law on Enterprise also permits shareholders to sue on behalf of the company when the above managerital personnels commit violations, causing damage directly to the company and indirectly to shareholders.

Not all shareholders have the right to sue for the above managerial personnels, only those who own at least 1% of the total number of common shares. This restriction makes sense with respect of public companies, in order to eliminate unfair competition actions conducted by minority shareholders who is controlled by the rival companies because amount of 1% in public company is not a small number.

Similar to a lawsuit against a manager, shareholder or group of shareholders is also required to own at least 5% of the total number of common shares to request rescission of the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders if there is violation on substantive law and procedural law. Accordingly, all resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders violating the substantive laws or the company’s charter are rescinded at the request of shareholders, but only serious procedural violations may be rescinded. There is no specific instructions for serious procedural violations at this time, the assessment will depend on personal perspective of the court and arbitrator.

Recently, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam has carried out investigations to apply anti-dumping measures against some commodities imported into Vietnam.

The law of Vietnam also has a number of law documents governing this matter in detail. Specifically, ordinance No. 20/2004/PL-UBTVQH11 issued on April 29th, 2004 of the Standing Committee of the National Assembly and the Decree No. 90/2005/ND-CP issued on July 11th, 2005 governs the anti-dumping matters and the regulations on the implementation of several articles of the ordinance on anti-dumping of goods imported to Vietnam.

Vietnamese Media Search

Due Diligence Law firm in Vietnam

In terms of content, ordinance 20/2004 regulating the anti-dumping measures; procedures, contents of investigation for application and the application of such measures against dumped goods imported into Vietnam. Decree 90/2005 regulating the implementation of some articles of the Ordinance 20/2004 on the anti-dumping investigation agency, the Council that handling anti-dumping cases; procedures, contents of investigation and the application of anti-dumping measures to goods imported into Vietnam.

On December 24th, 2015, Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam has received written request from 4 Vietnam companies about applying anti-dumping measures to galvanized steel products imported into Vietnam from People’s Republic of China (including Hong Kong) and South Korea.

The requesting parties (4 Vietnam companies) believe that quantity and prices of the product under investigation and other factors have created negative impact their goods consumption, leaded to negative effects on production activities; for example, domestic goods’ market share has decreased, loss ratio has increased, price of domestic products has fell and inventory has risen… Moreover, increasing import products brings about damage to domestic industry. Hence, an investigation has been implemented by the investigation agency, which is the Vietnam Competition Authority (VCA), under the Ministry of Industry and Trade. The VCA will publicly hold a consultation with related parties before finishing the investigation stage. The Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade will apply anti-dumping tax which comes into effect retroactively in order to prevent the considerable increase of dumping goods in Vietnam that have caused damages to the domestic industry.

On June 30th, in Hanoi, European Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam (“EuroCham”) and Prime Minister’s Advisory Council for Administrative Procedure Reform held the Dialogue. With theme “Administrative Reform: A Key Role in EVFTA Implementation”, the Dialogue is to discuss administrative reform ahead of the implementation of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (“EVFTA”) which enters into force on August 1st. The Dialogue brought together many ministries and sectors; EuroCham; diplomatic missions; journalists; numerous representatives of the business community, … to discuss how administrative reform can help to unlock the full potential of the EVFTA. Specially, the event also featured the launch of EuroCham’s 12th Whitebook publication.

The successful implementation of EVFTA in 2020 is very important. In order for EVFTA to come into effect, Vietnamese competent authorities, Europe and enterprises needed to continue implementing solutions to ensure the effectiveness of implementation, including the establishment of EVFTA Business Council for reviewing the challenges in the implementation process and coordinating. The more important thing is Vietnam’s efforts to implement administrative reforms, creating an open investment environment for enterprises.

At the event, 17 difficulty groups of European enterprises have been stated (pharmaceutical, medical equipment, intellectual property, labor, law enforcement, food, agriculture, automotive industry, motorbike, digital technology, tax and transfer pricing, tourism-hotel …) related to field of state management and settlement of Ministries, sectors and authorities … Most of the reflections and recommendations of the enterprises are from the practice of production and business activities.

In fact, Vietnam has made many administrative procedure reforms, from processing dossiers and documents, handling manual works to processing dossier and documents, solving works on electronic, non-paper environment; continue to cut administrative procedures, business conditions, products and goods subject to specialized inspection. The resolution of administrative procedures under the “One-door” and “One-stop-shop” mechanism has received many positive feedbacks.

EuroCham has developed clear recommendations, orientations and analysis to complete the legal framework in the context of EVFTA implementation in a very wide range. They are issues related to case law, competition, commercial mediation activities, dialogues at the Court, the right to appeal, the validity of arbitral awards, commercial mediation, antitrust, public-private partnership (PPP), real estate, “conditional” business.

One of the remarkable proposals given is the proposal to reduce many taxes this year. Specifically, EuroCham proposed reducing by 50% for corporate income tax, reducing by 50% of personal income tax, reducing by 50% for VAT and reducing by 50% compulsory social security contributions. Remarkably, relating to reducing by 50% of registration tax-fee of domestic assembled cars, Whitebook requests “the removal of a discriminatory taxation reduction applying only to locally assembled vehicles, and recommend applying it to all automotive assemblers, importers and dealers of new vehicles”. In addition to above proposals, EuroCham also requests more stimulus packages that could bolster the economy after Covid-19.

Regarding to Business Confidence Index BCI, inspite of reduction, EuroCham representative predicted this index will recover soon. Regarding mergers and acquisitions, M&A is also expected to continue to grow more quickly in 2020, especially in the context of the EVFTA Agreement ratified.

The EuroCham’s Whitebook publication, the annual report of EuroCham, is also launched which summarises the important issues for the business activities of 17 sector committees under EuroCham, together with recommendations that the Vietnamese Government can implement to improve the domestic business environment and enhance trade and investment with the EU.

Whitebook 2020 of Trade & Investment issues implemented by EuroCham, developed recommendations to complete the legal framework and policies to implement the EVFTA Agreement.

The publication of the Whitebook is to continue promoting positive progress in administrative reform, streamlining business conditions, strengthening the business and investment enviroment, sharing the goal of attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) with Vietnam Government. If the recommendations of EuroCham are thoroughly considered by the Government, more and more European businesses will invest in the country in the future. This important publication reflects the sincere wishes of the European business community in supporting the Government’s reform program and helping Vietnam more attractive, more competitive and more friendly towards enterprises.

Vietnam acknowledged EuroCham’s efforts in the launch of the publication and appreciated the focus of this year’s Whitepaper on administrative reform – an essential process for the smooth implementation of the EVFTA. This publication has reflected the desires of the European business community to promote the improvement of the business environment in Vietnam.

Vietnam has been considered as an attractive fit for family offices. The Vietnam’s stock market has been around fifteen ten years. Fund certificates in various forms are available such as close ended fund, open ended fund, Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). Foreign investors are now allowed to hold up to 49% shares in a listed company and this room has been in the process to change in the near future. Although Vietnam market is considered small for pension funds or the similar, this market is a right fit for family offices.

Further, foreigners are now allowed to make direct investment, hold 100% and conduct business in most areas after the new investment law’s effective date of Jul 1st, 2015. The real estate law has been passed with effective on the same date with new investment law, allowing foreigners entering Vietnam to buy real estate.

We are a local professional management consulting firm with family office service that assist foreign clients with asset management and consolidated reporting of all the family’s assets.

In particular, we provide wealth management and tax planning, trustee and corporate services, and support with indirect investment, direct investment, real estate and family governance.

We are your consultants and we could act as nominee shareholder, nominee director, or provide management service that help you achieve the goal, and stay in private status at the same time.

We look forward to helping you find the family office services you need in Vietnam.

When applicants of invention or mark are granted patent or trademark certificate, they are obliged to use these subjects. The reason for this provision which is, the owner may not use patents or trademarks in practical causing difficulties for the person who would like to use the patent and trademark in reality but cannot register as others has already registered.

According to Article 136 Vietnam Law on intellectual property clearly regulated on obligations of owner in using patent and trademark.

Firstly, to patent, the owner is be obliged to manufacture protected products or apply protected processes to satisfy the requirements of national defence and security, disease prevention, and treatment and nutrition of the people or to meet other social urgent needs. When the needs stipulated in this clause arise but an invention owner fails to perform such obligation, the competent State body may license such invention to others without permission from the invention owner in accordance with the law.

Secondly, to trademark, trademark holder is obliged to use trademark continuously. Trademark used under a trademark use agreement by a transferee is also considered as an act of using the holder’s trademark. In case the trademark is not used continuously for five years or more, the Trademark Certificate of Registration shall be invalid.

Specifically, if the trademark holder or the person who is allowed to use the trademark do not use the trademark within continuous five years before the date of request to terminate the validity without reasonable reason, except the using starts or restarts at least 03 months up to date of having the termination of validity request.

Trademark is a sign for consumers to identify the goods or services of each company from those of others.

In Vietnam, many businesses today have not paid sufficient attention to trademark protection. Only when their trademarks would be infringed by other companies or competitors, they really concern to protect their trademarks and business through trademark registration, trademark opposition or take further actions. Such situation will negatively impact the business financially.

Trademark in Vietnam

Trademark rights will be protected within the national territory, therefore when a trademark has been registered in Vietnam, it will be protected in Vietnam. If one company wishes their trademarks to be protected in other countries, it could:

-Directly register in each country or

-Register via the Madrid International registration by filing a single application which indicates the registrations at respective countries.

If registered under the Madrid International, firstly, trademarks must have been submitted trademark applications or have registered in Vietnam, depending on whether the country for protection is under the Madrid Protocol or the Madrid Agreement.

Law on Intellectual Property and its related documents could also be referred to for further information.

ANT Lawyers’ services in the field of trademark registration advice covers:

-Look-up, assess and consult possibilities to register trademark in Vietnam and abroad;

-Represent clients in applying for certificates of trademark registration, record modification, extend degree of trademark protection in Vietnam and abroad;

-Evaluate the effectiveness of the certificate of trademark registration and the possibility of trademark rights violation;

-Implement of the protected trademark rights: investigate, monitor, negotiate, seek arbitration or initiate a lawsuit or request other competent agencies for handling of infringement in Vietnam and abroad;

-Negotiate, draft, evaluate and register the of changing trademark ownership in Vietnam and abroad;

-Advise on building strategies, brand development;

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business?

Please click here to learn more about ANT Lawyers Foreign Investment Practice or contact our Law firms in Vietnam for advice via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call our office at +84 28 730 86 529

1. Overview

Vietnam’s banking sector has shown significant improvement which results from stable inflation and interested rate, favorable environment for foreign direct investment and a shift from deficit to surplus of the country’s current account. This sector plays a crucial role in Vietnam’s economic development in recent years.

2.Banking system

There are two tiers in banking sector in Vietnam. The first one is State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) which is responsible for monetary policy and supervision/regulation of the banking system in Vietnam. The second one consists of commercial banks, financial companies, credit co-operatives, people’s credit funds, and insurance companies. The main activity driving banking system is commercial bank which includes 5 state-owned commercial banks, 33 joint stock commercial banks, 5 joint venture commercial banks and 5 wholly-owned foreign owned bank.

Set-up business in Vietnam

Register business in Vietnam

Law firms in Vietnam

State owned commercial banks (SOCB) account for more than 40% of market share. The largest bank in terms of total assets, network and still 100% state owned share is Agribank. And four other SOCB areVietcom bank, Viettin Bank, BIDV and MHB.

Joint stock commercial banks (JSCB) have small capital/deposit base and more diversified shareholding structured compared to state owned commercial banks. There are currently 33 JSCB, which the leading ones are SaiGon Joint Stock Commercial Bank (SCB), Military Joint Stock Commercial Bank (MBB), Vietnam Export Import Commercial Joint Stock Bank (EIB), Asia Commercial Bank (ACB) and SaiGonThuong Tin Commercial Joint Stock Bank (STB)

Also SBV had granted 5 licences to permit HSBC, Standard Charter Bank, ANZ Bank, Shinhan Bank and Hong Leong Bank to establish as wholly-owned foreign banks

3.Potential opportunities for foreign investment

There are solid evidences to prove that Vietnam’s banking sector has such a huge potential for foreign investment

-Government effort of reforming banking system

SBV suggested that merge and acquisition of loss making and incompetent bank would be necessary to improve efficiency within the industry. For example, in 2015, SBV forced merge of loss making Vietnam Construction Bank to Vietcom bank with purchasing share price for 0 VND. By forcing merge and acquisition of incompetent banks, SBV has increased exploitation of economies of scale and the reduced burden on regulators

-Trade agreements facilitate foreign ownership and investment

Have taken part in variety of trade agreement such as Trans Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (TTP), Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Free Trade Agreement with different countries, Vietnam has made restructuring move to standardize banking system which will be compatible and accessible to other countries. Vietnam is required to have bilateral arrangement which eliminate the challenges of foreign establishment of banking services.

The government also encourages foreign investors to hold shares for five year period and partnering with the local bank to enhance management, capacity or new development. With the 30% limit of oversea ownership to domestic banks, the strategic foreign investors are allowed to acquire up to 15% of share in a bank, and up to 20% with Prime Ministerial approval. HSBC has also invested in a leading local bank, possessing a 20% stake in the Vietnam Technological and Commercial Joint Stock Bank—Techcombank. It is also the sole foreign strategic partner of the BaoViet Finance-Insurance Group, Vietnam’s largest insurance company. In a vote of confidence in the insurer, HSBC increased its stake to 18% in October 2009.

-Vietnam- a destination of foreign investment in South East Asian market

There is a huge untapped market in Vietnam. According to SBV, only 20% of more than 90 million citizens in Vietnam hold bank accounts and 3% of the population have credit cards. With 87% of the population under the age of 54, there is a great opportunity for retail banking activity development in Vietnam.

Also it is agreed that SME and rural areas have had challenges to access bank investment and loan. The data of Asian Development Bank shows that “lack the capacity to assess the risk of investment into SMEs and find bankable projects” and lack of knowledge about loan and lending systems for rural citizens are the main reasons leading to currentunder-banked circumstances.

The stable economic with GDP growth of around 6% to 7%; low wage costs; a large population with a high savings rate and lack of innovative approach to the market are advantages for foreign investors to accelerate financial and industrial development in Vietnam market.

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business?

The changes of laws will be monitored by ANT Lawyers. For advice or service request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call +84 28 730 86 529

In the period of industrialization and modernization, foreign investors are the objects that the government calls for investment. When deciding to invest in Vietnam, the main form is to contribute capital to buy shares and become a shareholder, this is considered the most common form. However, changes in business usually take place and they must be done under strict procedures to control.

In case of change of information that foreign shareholders in unlisted joint stock companies: According to Article 52 of Decree 78/2015/ND-CP, when this change is made, the company must notify the Business Registration Office where the enterprise has registered. The notice shall contain the following information: name, business identification number, tax code or number of business registration certificate (in case the enterprise have not a business identification number or tax code yet); information of a shareholder being a foreign investor transferring shares; information of foreign investors being transferred shares; full name, identity card number or passport or other lawful personal identification and signature of the company's legal representative.

Enclosed with the Notice, the company must send the Decision and a valid copy of the Meeting Minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders on the change of shareholders being foreign investors; list of shareholders being foreign investors when changed; a share transfer contract or documents proving the completion of the transfer; A valid copy of the Establishment Decision or other equivalent document and a document of the Department of Planning and Investment approving the foreign investor's capital contribution, share purchase in accordance with the Law on Investment.

Upon receipt of the notice, the Business Registration Office shall give a receipt, check the validity of the file, change information about the shareholders being foreign investors in the National Enterprise Registration Database. In case of an enterprise's need, the Business Registration Office shall issue a Certification of changing the enterprise registration information to the enterprise.

In cases of changing basic information of foreign investors:

According to Article 54 of Decree 78/2015 / ND-CP, within 03 days from the change of name, enterprise ID number, head office address, number of shares and type of shares and last name , name, nationality, passport number, permanent address of authorized representatives of shareholders being foreign organizations, enterprises send notice of supplementation and update of business registration information to the Registration Office where the enterprise is headquartered.

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business?

The changes of laws will be monitored by ANT Lawyers. For advice or service request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call +84 28 730 86 529

When participating in economic relations, the occurrence of disputes and conflicts between individuals and organizations is inevitable. In the dispute, all parties want to find the solution to resolve the dispute to best ensure their rights and affect the relationship between the parties is the lowest, so as to achieve efficiency but less costly time and money. Therefore, the choice of dispute resolution method is extremely important. In fact, the most commonly used methods of dispute resolution include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and court.

Competition Lawyers in Vietnam

Negotiation is the first method of settlement in the dispute resolution process, which is reflected in the fact that the parties in the dispute actively meet, discuss and agree on each party's rights and obligations.

The law on dispute resolution does not require the parties to negotiate. Therefore, from the process of organization, implementation, the presence of the parties, the rights and obligations of the entities, the negotiation results are not subject to the adjustment of legal regulations. It all depends on the goodwill of the parties. In case an agreement is reached in the negotiation meeting, and then one of the parties fails to comply, the parties cannot request the competent state agency to carry out the enforcement.

The mode of negotiation is usually prioritized by the parties when the dispute occurs, because this method is adjust by the law and not restricted by strict regulations on the process of negotiation, participants, time, as well as inexpensive money. Due to the self-settlement with each other, disputes should not be greatly enlarged, without affecting the reputation of the parties. Also because there is no regulation of the law, there is no enforcement on the bargaining results.

How ANT Lawyers Could Help Your Business?

The changes of laws will be monitored by ANT Lawyers. For advice or service request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call +84 28 730 86 529